Resurrection Is a Fact. But Not How You Think.

The idea of bringing extinct species back to life, a process known as “de-extinction,” has long fascinated both scientists and equally the general public. Thanks to recent advancements in genetic engineering and cloning technologies, what was once considered purely science fiction is now becoming a real possibility.

De-extinction relies on several key technologies. First, there is DNA sequencing and reconstruction, which allows scientists to read and recreate the genetic code of extinct species. Second, gene editing tools like CRISPR enable researchers to modify and repair genetic material. Finally, cloning techniques such as somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) make it possible to create embryos using the reconstructed genetic material.

For species that have gone extinct relatively recently, scientists may have access to preserved DNA samples. This genetic material can be sequenced and used as a blueprint to recreate the species’ genome. Gene editing allows researchers to fill in gaps or make necessary modifications. The reconstructed genome can then potentially be inserted into the egg cell of a closely related living species to create an embryo.

While de-extinction research is still in its early stages, there are several potential practical Proponents of de-extinction technology highlight several potential applications that could have significant benefits for ecosystems, scientific research, conservation efforts, climate change mitigation, and various fields of study. These applications showcase the potential positive impacts of bringing extinct species back to life.

One of the primary applications is ecosystem restoration. Many extinct species played vital roles in their environments, and their absence has led to imbalances in ecosystems. By reviving these species, scientists hope to restore ecological balance and enhance biodiversity. A notable example is the work being done by Colossal Biosciences to bring back a version of the woolly mammoth. Their goal is to reintroduce this species to the Siberian tundra, potentially helping to restore this ecosystem and mitigate some effects of climate change in the region.

Another significant application is in the field of scientific research. Revived species could offer valuable insights into evolution, genetics, and the biology of extinct animals. This knowledge could have far-reaching applications in various scientific fields, including medicine and conservation biology. By studying these revived species, researchers might gain a deeper understanding of how animals adapt to changing environments or develop resistance to certain diseases, which could inform current conservation efforts and medical research.

The technologies developed for de-extinction could also be applied to aid conservation efforts for currently endangered species. For instance, genetic engineering techniques used in de-extinction might be employed to increase the genetic diversity of small populations of endangered animals. This could potentially make these populations more resilient and less vulnerable to diseases or other threats, thereby improving their chances of survival.

Some scientists argue that reviving certain extinct species could contribute to efforts to combat climate change. The woolly mammoth project, for example, aims to restore grasslands in the Arctic. The theory is that these large animals would trample the snow, exposing the soil to colder air and helping to preserve the permafrost. This could potentially reduce the release of greenhouse gases that are currently trapped in the frozen ground, thus contributing to climate change mitigation efforts.

Lastly, de-extinction research could lead to innovations in agriculture and medicine. The genetic traits of extinct species might prove valuable for developing more resilient crops or livestock, or for understanding and treating human diseases. For instance, studying the genetics of extinct species that were resistant to certain diseases could provide insights for developing new treatments or preventive measures for similar diseases in humans or current animal species. This could potentially open up new avenues for medical research and treatment development.

While the potential benefits of de-extinction are intriguing, the field is not without controversy. There are sThe process of bringing extinct species back to life, known as de-extinction, raises several important ethical considerations that need to be carefully addressed. These concerns touch on various aspects of animal welfare, environmental impact, resource management, conservation efforts, and the very nature of species identity.

One of the primary concerns is animal welfare. The cloning techniques used in de-extinction often involve numerous failed attempts and can result in health problems for the animals that are successfully created. There are serious questions about whether it is right to bring an animal into existence in a world that has changed dramatically since its species went extinct. The environment these animals would be born into might be vastly different from the one they were adapted to, potentially causing them suffering or hardship.

Another significant concern is the potential impact on existing ecosystems. Reintroducing a species that has been absent for a long time could have unexpected and possibly harmful effects on the current balance of nature. Ecosystems have continued to evolve and change since these species disappeared, and other animals may have taken over the ecological roles once filled by the extinct species. There is a risk that reintroduced species could become invasive, disrupting the delicate balance that has been established in their absence.

The allocation of resources is another important consideration. De-extinction projects require substantial funding and scientific resources. Some argue that these resources could be better used to protect and conserve species that are currently endangered. With limited funds available for conservation efforts, there is a debate about whether it is wise to divert money and attention towards bringing back extinct species when so many living species are at risk of disappearing.

There is also concern about the potential for moral hazard. If people begin to view extinction as a reversible process, it might reduce the urgency of current conservation efforts. This could lead to a dangerous mindset where we become less vigilant about protecting endangered species, thinking that we can always bring them back later if they go extinct. Such an attitude could potentially undermine decades of work in wildlife conservation.

Last but not least, there are philosophical questions about the authenticity and identity of de-extinct species. If an animal is genetically reconstructed, possibly with modifications to help it survive in the current environment, is it truly the same as the original extinct species? This raises complex questions about what defines a species and whether a genetically modified version of an extinct animal can be considered the same creature or something entirely new.

Several de-extinction projects are currently underway, focusing on species that went extinct relatively recently:

• Woolly Mammoth: Colossal Biosciences is working on creating a mammoth-elephant hybrid.
• Tasmanian Tiger: The University of Melbourne is leading efforts to bring back this extinct marsupial.
• Passenger Pigeon: The organization Revive & Restore is working on reviving this once-abundant bird species.
• Gastric-Brooding Frog: The University of Newcastle in Australia is attempting to bring back this unique frog species.

These projects are in various stages of development, with none having yet produced a living animal. However, they are making progress in areas like genome sequencing and embryo development.

The field of de-extinction presents curious possibilities for science, conservation, and our understanding of life itself. While the practical applications are promising, from ecosystem restoration to potential medical breakthroughs, the ethical challenges are significant and cannot be ignored.

#DeExtinction #BringingBackExtinctSpecies #ConservationScience