The World Health Organization estimates there are around one billion cases of influenza (the flu) globally each year. While we may recover from the flu, it’s not a one-time deal. The reason? The influenza virus is a master of disguise.
Mutation: The Flu’s Shape-Shifting Trick
As the flu virus replicates inside our bodies, it makes copies of itself. During this process, errors can occur in the virus’s genetic code, leading to mutations. These small changes can accumulate over time, creating new flu strains. These new strains may evade our immune system’s defenses, allowing them to infect people who have previously had the flu or even been vaccinated against older strains.
Species Specificity: Not All Flus Are Created Equal
Typically, the flu virus infects a specific host or group of hosts. For example, the human flu virus can’t infect our canine companions. However, sometimes mutations can dramatically change the flu virus, allowing it to jump species barriers. This is what happened with the swine flu and bird flu outbreaks, where viruses originally infecting pigs and birds mutated to infect humans.
Natural Selection: A Prank on Our Ancestors?
Imagine this: you’re relaxing in your car when a toy snake lands on the windshield. You jump and scream, even though you know it’s fake. This instinctive fear of snakes is a classic example of natural selection at play in our evolutionary history.
Fear of Snakes: A Survival Tool
In our ancestral environment, likely sub-Saharan Africa, the ability to quickly detect and avoid snakes was crucial for survival. Those who reacted swiftly to snake threats were more likely to live long enough to reproduce and pass on their genes. Over generations, this natural selection process favored individuals with a built-in fear of snakes. This explains why even today, the mere mention of snakes can trigger an uneasy feeling in many of us.
Sexual Selection: Beyond Physical Beauty
In the United States alone, cosmetic surgery is a multi-billion dollar industry. But why do we strive for a youthful appearance and athletic physique? While some might argue it’s about physical attractiveness, the story goes deeper.
The Takeaway
Our ancestors likely relied more on instinct than conscious choice when selecting mates. Physical characteristics that signaled good health, strength, and fertility were considered desirable. Choosing young and fit partners increased the chances of survival and reproduction for both parents and offspring. Strong, young males who could provide protection and resources were more likely to have offspring, while young and healthy females were more likely to have children who survived to adulthood. These ancestral preferences continue to influence our ideas of beauty today, even if our environment and social structures have changed significantly.
#EverydayEvolution #NatureVsNurture #WhyWeDoWhatWeDo
